Saturday, April 4, 2020
US Government Essays - United States, James Madison,
  US Government  The    U.S. Government has three branches of government Legislative, Judicial, and    Executive. These branches of government have a mean of checks (constitutional)  by the other branches. Each has certain powers to check and balances the other  two branches. The good about these checks is for that the other two branches  don't get to powerful. When the constitution was first forming, the checks and  balances where first used. Each branch of government is different. Legislative  branch is made up of the Congress. The Executive branch is the President and his  staff. The Judicial branch is made up of the Supreme Court and other Federal  courts. Legislative branch makes the law, Executive branch carries out the law,  and judicial branch interprets the law. During time the system of Checks and    Balances were use over the years as it was intended to do. Congress makes the  laws, creates agencies and programs, and appropriates funds to carry out the  laws and programs. They may override veto with two-thirds vote, may remove the    President through impeachment, and the Senate approves treaties and presidential  appointments. The Executive branch appoints Supreme Court Justices and other  federal judges. The Judicial branch judges, appointed for life, are free from  executive control. They also have the courts declare executive actions to be  unconstitutional. Clashes between each branch are hardly ever known. The system  of check-balance system operates all the time. Most of the checks happen in the    Capital. But some clashes can occur; The President does veto some acts of    Congress. On some occasion, Congress has override one of the president vetoes.    And some rare occasion, the Senate does reject one of the president's  appointees. And most direct confrontations are not common. The three branches  try to avoid them. The Checks-and-Balance system makes compromise easy and  necessary-and its part of the democratic government. In James Madison in his  essay, The federalist No.51, uses words to describe the main idea the uses of    Checks and Balances or in other words keeping the branches of government "in  their proper places." An example, when the President picks someone to serve in  some important office in the executive branch. Say the Secretary of State of the    Director of the F.B.I or the C.I.A, and the President is aware that the Senate  must confirm that appointment. In other words the President picks someone who  will very likely be approved by the Senate. In similar was when Congress makes  law. It does so with a careful eye on the President's veto power. And the  power of the courts to review its actions. Checks-and-balances system has  prevented "an unjust combination of the majority." It has not very often  stalled a close working relationship between the executive, legislative, and  judicial branches from time to time. The President and a majority in both houses  of Congress are especially true in good working relationship. When the other  party controls one or both houses, conflicts play a larger than usual part in  that relationship-as they have in recent years. As part of the system of checks  and balances, court have the power of judicial review. The power to decide  whether what government does is in accord with what the Constitution provides In  other words the U.S. government has used the system of checks and balances for  many of years. And it will be this way for many other years until someone  changes it. But I think that will come to mind.    
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
 
